Lessons from the past

Breathing new life into science shops

Hedel_spoorbrug wikicommons  Marc Zoutendijk
The bridge at Hedel. Photo: Wikicommons

The noise was intense, every time a train thundered past. There I was, together with fellow student Marijn and a very expensive decibel meter, standing in the living room of a nice lady. We were there to measure whether the trains on the railway bridge over the Maas were causing too much noise in the brand-new flats in Den Bosch. It felt like a very important assignment.

That spring day in 2001 made by far the biggest impression on me during my entire physics degree programme in Utrecht. As part of a practical lab, we had to take noise measurements and write a report about them. The flat residents could then use that report to demand better sound insulation from the contractor. 

The term Community Engaged Learning had not yet been invented – or at least I never came across it as a student. But what Marijn and I did there was, of course, Community Engaged Learning at its best. A practical assignment for and with the flat residents of Den Bosch as social partners. And we even got credits for it.

Those flat residents approached Utrecht University via the Physics Shop, one of seven science shops that existed in Utrecht at the time. Other faculties also had such knowledge hubs. They flourished during my student days. DUB published a wildly enthusiastic article about how Utrecht's approach to science shops would conquer Europe. That article, from October 2000, exudes the spirit of Open Science and Open Education and would fit right into the UU's current mission and vision. 

Unfortunately, the science shops did not survive. Around 2015, all science shops and other knowledge hubs were closed as part of budget cuts. In a few places, there are still programmes such as UniCity Honours and Clinical Legal Education that work in a similar way, but compared to twenty years ago, it is meagre. Science shops have also been cut back at almost all other Dutch universities; although in Groningen and Wageningen do they still exist. 

Yet they would fit so well into our current vision of education. Science shops as places where the university and society meet. As drivers of Community Engaged Learning. However, there is no mention of them in the Strategic Plan 2025-2030 or in the updated education model.

But it's still possible. We can revitalise the Utrecht science shops. If we start with some funding for a coordinator and some equipment (I remember that decibel meter being very expensive, but I see you can buy them for a few tens of euros), we could get started right away. Perhaps a nice USO project?

Every time I cross that bridge on the train to Den Bosch, I look at that flat. And every time, I'm glad that at least one part of my studies was not only for myself, but also for others. Thanks to the science shop!

Erik van Sebille is Professor of Oceanography and Public Engagement at the Institute for Marine & Atmospheric Research and the Freudenthal Institute. The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of DUB.

Login to comment

Comments

We appreciate relevant and respectful responses. Responding to DUB can be done by logging into the site. You can do so by creating a DUB account or by using your Solis ID. Comments that do not comply with our game rules will be deleted. Please read our response policy before responding.
:

Mooi pleidooi. Er is echt wel iets verloren gegaan met het verdwijnen van de wetenschapswinkels en later kennispunten. Waar de wetenschapswinkels in de verschillende losse disciplines vooral uit idealisme ontstonden in de jaren '70, zag je bij de hervorming naar kennispunten op facultair niveau vooral de ambitie dat zij bruggenbouwers zouden zijn naar samenwerkingen met het bedrijfsleven en op die manier geld in het laatje zouden kunnen brengen. Passend bij die tijd waar 'kennisvalorisatie' toch veelal geldgedreven was. Ondertussen bleven er natuurlijk ook idealistisch gedreven projecten plaatsvinden, maar meer onder de radar. In die zin zou de geest van de wetenschapswinkels meer passen bij deze tijd dan die van de kennispunten, waarbij 'inverdienen' geen randvoorwaarde is voor je impact op de regio.

Ik vind het stukje uit DUB waar je naar verwijst veelzeggend voor de argumenten uit die tijd: "Vooralsnog kosten de kennispunten de universiteit vooral geld. Van Winden: “Jammer, maar andere zaken zijn ook waardevol. De UU betekent iets voor de maatschappij, voor de regio. Studenten lossen vraagstukken op en maken kennis met toekomstige werkgevers. Onderzoekers kunnen zien wanneer hun onderzoek in praktijk werkt en bouwen een vertrouwensband op met bedrijven. Subsidies worden steeds vaker samen met ondernemers aangevraagd."

Nu op zoek naar een model dat past bij deze tijd.

Advertisement